[ reply ] lyricserver sent a message with the title: Assman's english and received 1 replies.
message sent on data: 25/September/2005 12:44:54

On the contrary, using clichés is a very thoughtful process of the English language. Not only does it simplify a large, complex message into a well-known, grammatically correct phrase or sentence, the majority of the MEANING of said message is equivocally translated, thus needing to clarify the parts of the message which cannot be derived by using such a method of communication as a cliché. It's all a mattter of semantics, really, but to reply with such a request as to produce a required response to validate your argument rather than a fabrication is by such a polemic argument that can be told in varying degrees of explanation. Such explanation can quite brief that uses implied meanings (such as jonblazzz succeeded in acomplishing) or it can entail a verbose query whereby the reader is to have no implied meaning or understanding in said description of reply. However, in proceeding in such a matter requires, no demands that this explanation be carried out in a manner where far too many words occupy the space in which this reply is to be stationed. In this attempt to satisfy Assman25's assumption (by which I have bothered to surmise by deductive reasoning, I will translate jonblazzz answer to the original accusation in a more detail-oriented manner that only Assman25 can understand, assuming your intelligence quotient is of such a level that you yourself proclaim.

Assman25's query regarding the pleasure and appeal of feet was replied by jonblazzz in the manner that certain individuals are created differently, thereby creating the probability that an individual (or person in this scenario) is to find pleasing an object or action that quite possibly another individual may take as offensive. Inasmuch, the ability to respond to such an allegation as to what properties an individual requires for the pleasure of such an object or action is not possible under the linguistic possibilities of the English language because such properties remain non-verbal in state, thus lending to the impossibility of translation through the power of language. Under normal circumstances, I would be more than happy to provide an example demonstrating this opinion, but seeing as the level o finteligence that you quote is "TOO INTELLIGENT FOR THIS SITE!" then such an analogy would propigate the misunderstanding of said explanation.

Hopefully this reply will adequately satisfy you with the required information that you yourself desire. Inasmuch, I would like for you to comply with a small request that obviously a person of such great knowlege such as yourself can provide. the request is such that you should review the policies of the practice known as "nettiquette" and to preform a better ability in enforcing these regulations when responding to such a post in this beloved forum.

ASSMAN25 Wrote:
PEOPLE WHO USE CLICHE'S IN ORDER TO MAKE A POINT MOST CERTAINLY DENOTES A LACK OF INTELLIGENCE
AND INAGINATION. "TO EACH THEIR OWN"??? PLEASE; IF YOU ARE GOING TO RESPOND TO AN INQUIRY;
THEN DO SO WITH CLEAR CONCISE ENGLISH. BE MORE DETAIL ORIENTATED. YOU DID NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION. "TO EACH THEIR OWN" IS NOT AN ARTICULATE ANSWER! WHAT DO YOU FINF SO APPEALING ABOUT
A BROADS FOOT?
SINCERLEY;
THE INGENIOUS ASSMAN---IQ=15.4 (OBVIOUSLY TOO INTELLIGENT FOR THIS SITE!

(you forgot the decimal point in your IQ score.)

[ reply ] ASSMAN25 sent a message with the title: VERY WELL WRITTEN PROFESSOR and received 1 replies.
message sent on data: 25/September/2005 21:35:40

Hello Lyricserver;
I must commend you for your unbeleivably verbose, yet quite eloquent reply.
You were quite articulate. Unfortunately, you were also beating around the
bush. Imagine that; I used a clich'e. A circumlocutious response that still
does not directly address my initial question, is not helpful. You made your
point in regards to your superior intellect. Where was that much vaunted
intellect when these inarticulate perverts were posting messages that were
border line unintelligable? I had absolutely no problem understanding your
every word without having to consult the lexicon. You have proved that you
have an above average command of the English language. I am fully cognizant
that you were addressing me in the first person. Unfortunately; the vast
majority of people reading your reply will be consulting their grade school
level dictionaries. I must ask two questions however; the first is, did you
steal quotes from others after initiating a google search in order to
formulate your reply? The second is, what is the sexual appeal of a foot?
You cannot explain away my inquiry with an abstract construct. Answer the
question directly. Your reply was a non sequitur to someone with my
intellectual quotient. Be honest please; what is your IQ? I do not come on
the internet to think. I come on ther internet not to enjoy. If you are
truly intelligent, you would know that "The more complex the mind, the
more the need for the simplicity of play". I can razzle dazzle when I
need to properly express myself. This is a fetish porn site. You must
incorporate baby talk when addressing the general populous out here, if
you wish to be understood.
John

GreyAlien wrote: New story sent by an user via e-mail. and received 1 replies.
sent on data: 23/September/2005 14:45:59